Theology is a razor. Used incorrectly, it will cut you deeper and swifter than any other tool known to man. It can produce heresies of the most grotesque forms, like what Paul confronts in Romans 6 "Are we to sin because we are not under law but under grace". The person had followed Paul's thought beautifully up to that point, their theology was right on, but if not understood and applied correctly, theology becomes a license to all sorts of devilry. But if used correctly it can open up the most hard and unpenitent areas in a human soul. So it is with the doctrine of Election. I feel this is one of the most under-represented doctrines in our church today and aids in giving rise to both of the ill-born-dynamics we see existing in the church; 1) legalism: the thought that what you do before and for God in some way counts as benefit to your ultimate salvation, and 2) licentiousness: the thought that you are free to act as you please so long as you stay within "certain guidelines" and stray not 'too far'. 3) The other area that I believe the doctrine of Election applies to is the current strategy in consumer-driven cultures, namely American, of "Marketing" Jesus. I believe this doctrine has very real and dramatic notions to dispel from our thinking about our mode of reaching the lost for Christ's sake.
Before I endeavor to show why this doctrine of Election is so detrimental to the health of believers and Christ's church, i want to make an observation about licentiousness. Many believers who are licentious do not live a life of total and complete debauchery and lawlessness. Contrary, most are quite reserved and calculated about their license to sin. Few Christians operate under the paradigm represented above in Romans 6, that is, sinning so that grace may increase. I honestly have never met a Christian with that mentality. If I did, I would be more pleased them than with most Christians today. I say this because a person who lives sinfully so that grace may increase understands a dynamic of grace that most believers are totally blinded to (which is one reason why I am writing about Election, to bring this to our minds), that is, that God's grace extends over every single one of our actions, thoughts, deeds, motives, and so on. This person understands that dynamic of God's grace that He gives it so graciously and quite literally, lavishes it on wicked, wretched sinners. They understand that God's grace, that is, that of holding back his tremendous wrath and allowing such a pitiful, putrid creature to endure contorting the glory of God, is applied all the more to them after each and every sin they commit. So, we see, God's grace abounding more and more to such a sinner who is attempting to increase grace. We should all learn from this thought and remember that wonderful greatness of God's grace and how it alone leads us to salvation. The error in this thinking is quite obvious: they see not grace for what it is and that it saves them from the very thing they are doing that murders their own life.
But we are not faced with that kind of person, if you have seen otherwise, inform me so I may update my opinions. The kind of person we are confronted with, or that we are ourselves, is that of a specific license. We spend many hours justifying and calculating our sin that we love dearly so long as we stay within "certain guidelines". I want to bring to mind the old naive thought-line of "How far is too far". We are far too concerned with getting in our jollies then avoiding those things that have the ability of sending our souls into Hell - just examine what Jesus says in Matthew 18:7-9 "Woe to the world for temptations to sin! For it is necessary that temptations come, but woe to the one by whom the temptations come! And if your hand or your foot causes you to sin, cut it off and throw it away. It is better for you to enter life crippled or lame than with two hands or two feet to be thrown into eternal fire. And if your eye causes you to sin, tear it out and throw it away. It is better for you to enter life with one eye than with two eyes to be thrown into the hell of fire." Surely Jesus isn't talking about a simple sex scenes in a movie is he? I mean what harm comes from literally watching two people have sex? But even our mind in this is calculated - "I don't do those things and I don't approve of them". But you sit and watch and pay money to those who deal out trash for business. You may not do them, but surely your sitting and paying is enough support in itself. "I don't approve or support the homosexual agenda but I want to see the movie or broadway show "Rent" because of its acclaim and vivid portrayal of what homosexual people endure". Much of our license is not blatant "courageous sinning" (if I may steal Martin Luther's term), it is much more deviant and thoughtful. It is a mentality of "So long as I am not...". The attitude is of willful ignorance. There is no effort to seek out what the Lord would have them do but instead to satisfy their own desires. This is why I would rather have a person who sins to increase grace - at least they are honest and open about their sin; than one who thinks he abides by grace but instead calls his deeds "restrained" when the main thing on his mind is his own satisfaction. This person has forgotten grace and the newness of life (Romans 6:4) the Savior who has called them to.
Many of us may find ourselves in this position. Or we may find our hearts nearer to the legalist. I believe a correct and hearty understanding of the doctrine of God's predestining work of Election will help to alter and transform such erroneous thinking. It is not alone in its aid to changing these attitudes and heart motives, but Election is a building block to help a person stand more firmly on the work of God in their lives in their fight against sin and pursuit of seeing God.
Friday, September 29, 2006
God's Predestining Purpose of Election: Introduction
Posted by Nate Paschall at 6:24 AM 0 comments
Sunday, September 17, 2006
Greed of Unjust Gain: It Takes Away the Life of Its Possessors. Therefore, Find Your Gain In the LORD
I see something of an active and a passive role of the enticement shown in Proverbs 1:10. There is the active enticement of sinners: those who directly come to you and speak their words and entreat you to join them in their blood-shed. But this is not usually the way a person is enticed. I don't find often in my circumstances people approaching me directly and so brashly requesting me to commit such blatant acts of sin. Often the way I am enticed, rather, is by my perception and desire of those who commit such acts. Their behavior is one that is misleading and enticing. Without words they can speak with their behaviors and through my own desires do i find myself enticed by their sin. This is the passive role of enticement: that is, one that I rather look upon with a lust and a fleshly desire and am instead enticed by what appears to bring gain. In its essence, I find myself saying "I want that".
There always appears to be a profit with these men, hence the unjust gain mentioned in verse 19. This is the bait that snares. If there were no apparent profit in such behavior or actions then there would be no desire to join in the blood-shed. But there is a gain and profit in their doings. But as Solomon shows for us, the gain and profit they seek is a vapor and vanity which in the end takes away the life of its possessor. The reason it takes away the life of its possessor is not because of the object itself, but it is rather the inordinate desire that is the ultimate undoing of such a person. A true desire is meant to lead you to something that will bring you life, but the desires these men of blood-shed are twisted. The reason for such an undoing on account of distorted desires is because the desire always leads to something that cannot finally quench. Their desires are then always unsatisfying, and like a man who is lost in a desert and has but a single drop of water at the end of each day, his life is literally stripped from him in pursuit of that desire which will never be satisfied; he will never have a mouth or belly full of water.
I see yet another dimension of the man of blood-shed. In reading the Psalms, David continually portrays his constant satisfaction he has in God and how the LORD is his only good. On the other hand, those of men of blood-shed are never satisfied; continually seeking but never finding, continually murdering but never gaining enough to satisfy. This is another dimension to how this distorted desire takes away the life of its possessor, for they are never freed to say "I am content, there is no more I seek". Only one who knows the LORD is able to say "I am content, there is no more I seek". A man of blood-shed can never rest. If he does rest, it is false, it appears to our untrained eyes as a rest, but i venture to say that this man is doing one of two things, if not both. The first is he is looking ahead to his next venture of gain that he believes will truly satisfy his insatiable appetite, hence the inordinate desire. But there is also another man, and he is one who believes that he has found that one thing that he believes provides him with satisfaction he desires. He is constantly looking behind, which I think is much more common among us than we would admit. The end of such a person is the same as the first, that is, they are never satisfied with their possession. The reason for this is that they are constantly seeking to protect this gain, and in the process are never allowed to fully drink of it. Their pursuit of security of such a possession is their ultimate undoing, it takes their life away. Instead of their life spent actually fully enjoying what it is they pursued, their life is spent in a constant pursuit of preserving that which they seek to enjoy. Such is the nature of much of the insurance in our nation. We buy a house, but we are not fully able to enjoy it as we would like because we are forced to overwork ourselves to put up insurance to preserve our dwelling. We are not even allowed to take part in our own gain because our lives are dictated by fear. This is the manner of the one who lives his life constantly looking behind him, that is, constantly looking to preserve his desired.
This leads me to see that the LORD is the only one who can be enjoyed here and now, and even more so, the more we know of Him, the more we can enjoy him. The danger in such a thought is that we can become those who are raptured with wanting the more, and not raptured with having the now. That is, we can want the "having more of God" instead of simply "having God". Our desire for God even becomes one of unsatisfaction. We are always seeing that we are not at our full enjoyment of God and therefore always pursuing the 'more' so in turn we are never satisfied with what we have and not simply enjoying God Himself. The peace with such a thought, though, is that we who truly do enjoy God are aware that this moment is the best thus far and even more, it will only grow greater and greater, deeper and deeper, and more beautiful with each moment we spend knowing Him. We are not those seeking the next great revelation of enjoyment, but simply those who are ravished here and now with our LORD. We are those who are fully satisfied with this moment, as if there could be none better, when yet, the LORD provides a new moment that is now better than the last we had. But we are never left wanting more; we are simply satisfied.
The beauty of this contrasted with the depravation of the man of blood-shed is that the one who is satisfied in the LORD is not concerned with the two things of the man of blood-shed. He is not looking forward to obtain more, for what he has is overly sufficient - his desire is fully satisfied. Nor is he ever looking back to preserve his possession. He does not do this because he is aware of the limitlessness of the LORD, for nothing of Him can be taken away, so he is not constantly trying to preserve what he has, for what he does have can only be added unto and not in the slightest be taken away.
This leads me to think that if we are not experiencing the joy we seek, it is not as though it were taken away, but we are simply blinded to it because of our sin. Our peace with God is not taken away from us, it is just clouded by the haze of sin. We have not removed ourself out of the blessing of God, but we have placed ourselves in a position to no longer see the position. Our inheritance is guaranteed, the question we must ask ourselves is "do we see it". We must come humbly with repentance and seeking only to find the LORD with a heart and attitude that says "It is only You alone that I am after LORD, there truly is no good aside from You, You are my portion and inheritance forever. As the deer pants for the water, so my soul longs after You"
As Saint Augustine said "He loves Thee to little who loves anything together with Thee, which he loves not for Thy sake"
Posted by Nate Paschall at 2:45 AM 0 comments